Buy ‘Em All and Let God Sort Them Out
Harry at WatchingHorology takes the historical question: is it better to spend your stopper in a timeless piece or to buy ones, pieces inexpensive. The jury is obviously outside, but my suggestion is this: the cheaper pieces of purchase at the beginning and when you know what you want, sell them and buy the rveuse watch. Or, still, never buy the rveuse watch – recall you improve, when the watch had approximately 2 weeks of time of wrist, the flower is in addition to pink, friends. There are so much few watches which can resist a time longer than usual of use than it is almost the play of an imbecile.
Much suggested that I liquidate my collection to pass to a piece of higher value such as a repeater of swirl or minute. While I could have considered this, it has to still take root in my values of gathering. For me currently, I fell that unless it is absolutely certain that (above S$30k) the purchase will not depreciate, I will not fork the hard gained money outside nor will not liquidate the hard one to acquire pieces of little value which I have. Except for Pateks – that MAY has a certain insurance of its long-term value and resale market. Almost nothing in the world watch can promise a re-establishment of load of placement. For me, Patek does not do particularly anything for me at its point prices.
FAQ #2 – Collection simple of watch v of high values of central values [WatchingHorology]